nomadicNomadic civilization: historical researchNomadic civilization: historical research2782-3377Калмыцкий государственный университет им. Б.Б. Городовикова10.53315/2782-3377-2021-1-2-86-104nomadic-18Research ArticleПЕРЕВОДЫБыла ли Россия колониальной империей?Was Russia a Colonial Empire?ШорковицД.SchorkowitzD.

Диттмар Шорковиц, доктор исторических наук, профессор, старший научный сотрудник

Dittmar Schorkowitz, Ph.D., Dr. Phil. Habil., senior researcher

schorkowitz@eth.mpg.deИнститут социальной антропологии им. Макса ПланкаРоссияMax Planck Institute for Social Anthropology, Department of Law & AnthropologyRussian Federation2021211020211286104Copyright © Шорковиц Д., 20212021Шорковиц Д.Schorkowitz D.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.nomadic-kalmsu.ru/jour/article/view/18

Перевод выполнен по изданию Schorkowitz D. (2019). Was Russia a Colonial Empire? In: Schorkowitz D., Chávez J., Schröder I. (eds.) Shifting Forms of Continental Colonialism: Unfinished Struggles and Tensions. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9817-9_5. В тексте сохранена пунктуация переводчика.

The translation has been done from the edition: Schorkowitz D. (2019). Was Russia a Colonial Empire? In: Schorkowitz D., Chávez J., Schröder I. (eds.) Shifting Forms of Continental Colonialism: Unfinished Struggles and Tensions. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9817-9_5

РоссияСибирьколониализмКалмыцкое ханствополитикаRussiaSiberiacolonialismKalmyk KhanatepoliticsReferencesSchorkowitz, Dittmar (2017). Dealing with Nationalities in Imperial Formations: How Russian andSchorkowitz, Dittmar (2017). Dealing with Nationalities in Imperial Formations: How Russian andChinese Agencies Managed Ethnic Diversity in the 17th to 20th Centuries. Managing Frontiers in QingChinese Agencies Managed Ethnic Diversity in the 17th to 20th Centuries. Managing Frontiers in QingChina: The Lifanyuan and Libu Revisited, edited by Dittmar Schorkowitz and Chia Ning, 389–434.China: The Lifanyuan and Libu Revisited, edited by Dittmar Schorkowitz and Chia Ning, 389–434.Leiden: Brill.Leiden: Brill.Schorkowitz, Dittmar (2018). ‘… Dafi die Inorodcy niemand rettet und das Heil bei ihnen selbstSchorkowitz, Dittmar (2018). ‘… Dafi die Inorodcy niemand rettet und das Heil bei ihnen selbstliegt …’: Quellen und Beiträge zur historischen Ethnologie von Burjaten und Kalmücken. Wiesbaden:liegt …’: Quellen und Beiträge zur historischen Ethnologie von Burjaten und Kalmücken. Wiesbaden:Harrassowitz.Harrassowitz.Seton-Watson, Hugh ([1966] 1973). Moscow’s Imperialism. Crisis and Continuity in World Politics:Seton-Watson, Hugh ([1966] 1973). Moscow’s Imperialism. Crisis and Continuity in World Politics:Readings in International Relations, edited by George A. Lanyi and Wilson C. McWilliams, 114–117.Readings in International Relations, edited by George A. Lanyi and Wilson C. McWilliams, 114–117.New York: Random House.New York: Random House.Stahl, Kathleen Mary (1951). British and Soviet Colonial Systems. London: Faber and Faber Limited.Stahl, Kathleen Mary (1951). British and Soviet Colonial Systems. London: Faber and Faber Limited.Sunderland, Willard (2000). The ‘Colonization Question’: Visions of Colonization in Late ImperialSunderland, Willard (2000). The ‘Colonization Question’: Visions of Colonization in Late ImperialRussia. Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas, 48(2): 210–232.Russia. Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas, 48(2): 210–232.Sunderland, Willard (2004). Taming the Wild Field: Colonization and Empire on the Russian Steppe.Sunderland, Willard (2004). Taming the Wild Field: Colonization and Empire on the Russian Steppe.Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Sunderland, Willard (2010). The Ministry of Asiatic Russia: The Colonial Office That Never WasSunderland, Willard (2010). The Ministry of Asiatic Russia: The Colonial Office That Never Wasbut Might Have Been. Slavic Review, 69(1): 120–150.but Might Have Been. Slavic Review, 69(1): 120–150.Sunderland, Willard (2019). The Imperial Emancipations: Ending Non-Russian Serfdoms inSunderland, Willard (2019). The Imperial Emancipations: Ending Non-Russian Serfdoms inNineteenth-Century Russia. Shifting Forms of Continental Colonialism: Unfinished Struggles and Tensions,Nineteenth-Century Russia. Shifting Forms of Continental Colonialism: Unfinished Struggles and Tensions,edited by Dittmar Schorkowitz, John Chávez, and Ingo Schröder, 437-462. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.edited by Dittmar Schorkowitz, John Chávez, and Ingo Schröder, 437-462. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.Tillett, Lowell (1969). The Great Friendship: Soviet Historians on the Non-Russian Nationalities.Tillett, Lowell (1969). The Great Friendship: Soviet Historians on the Non-Russian Nationalities.Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press.Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press.Treadgold, Donald W. (1952). Russian Expansion in the Light of Turner’s Study of the AmericanTreadgold, Donald W. (1952). Russian Expansion in the Light of Turner’s Study of the AmericanFrontier. Agricultural History, 26(4): 147–152.Frontier. Agricultural History, 26(4): 147–152.Vinkovetsky, Ilya (2011). Russian America: An Overseas Colony of a Continental Empire, 1804–1867.Vinkovetsky, Ilya (2011). Russian America: An Overseas Colony of a Continental Empire, 1804–1867.Oxford: Oxford University Press.Oxford: Oxford University Press.Weinerman, Eli (1993). The Polemics Between Moscow and Central Asians on the Decline ofWeinerman, Eli (1993). The Polemics Between Moscow and Central Asians on the Decline ofCentral Asia and Tsarist Russia’s Role in the History of the Region. The Slavonic and East EuropeanCentral Asia and Tsarist Russia’s Role in the History of the Region. The Slavonic and East EuropeanReview, 71(3): 428–81.Review, 71(3): 428–81.Zorin, Vladimir Iur’evich (2013). Strategiia gosudarstvennoi natsional’noi politiki: Traditsionnost’Zorin, Vladimir Iur’evich (2013). Strategiia gosudarstvennoi natsional’noi politiki: Traditsionnost’i novye podkhody k ukrepleniiu edinstva mnogonatsional’nogo naroda Rossii (Rossiiskoi natsii)”i novye podkhody k ukrepleniiu edinstva mnogonatsional’nogo naroda Rossii (Rossiiskoi natsii)”[The Strategy of Governmental National Policy: Traditionalism and New Approaches for Consolidating the[The Strategy of Governmental National Policy: Traditionalism and New Approaches for Consolidating theUnity of Russia’s Multinational People (Russian Nation)]. X Kongress ėtnografov i antropologov Rossii:Unity of Russia’s Multinational People (Russian Nation)]. X Kongress ėtnografov i antropologov Rossii:Tezisy dokladov. Moskva, 2–5 iiulia 2013 g., edited by Marina Iur’evna Martynova, Natalina A. Lopulenko,Tezisy dokladov. Moskva, 2–5 iiulia 2013 g., edited by Marina Iur’evna Martynova, Natalina A. Lopulenko,and N.A. Belova, VII–XII. Moscow: IĖA RAN (in Russian).and N.A. Belova, VII–XII. Moscow: IĖA RAN (in Russian).

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.