nomadicNomadic civilization: historical researchNomadic civilization: historical research2782-3377Калмыцкий государственный университет им. Б.Б. Городовикова10.53315/2782-3377-2022-2-2-78-88nomadic-58Research ArticleЭТНОГРАФИЯ, ЭТНОЛОГИЯ И АНТРОПОЛОГИЯETHNOGRAPHY, ETHNOLOGY AND ANTHROPOLOGYВосемь особенностей поясничных позвонковEight features of the lumbar vertebraeТойшанулыА.ToyshanulyA.

Акедил Тойшанулы, кандидат филологических наук, эксперт

Akedil Toyshanuly, Doctor of Linguistics, Expert

Almaty

akedil8@mail.ruМеждународная Тюркская академияКазахстанInternational Turkic AcademyKazakhstan202201072022227888Copyright © Тойшанулы А., 20222022Тойшанулы А.Toyshanuly A.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.nomadic-kalmsu.ru/jour/article/view/58

У казахов и монголоязычных кочевых народов в прошлом имелось много неповторимых и разнообразных видов игр. Их национальные игры в большинстве своем были связаны с хозяйственной деятельностью кочевников, занимавшихся в основном разведением скота. Вполне естественно, что подрастающее поколение было хорошо знакомо с повадками и анатомическим строением домашних животных, что, безусловно, повлияло на специфику детских игровых развлечений. У названных кочевых народов имелись как подвижные игры, вырабатывавшие силу и ловкость у детей и подростков, так и интеллектуальные, способствовавшие развитию ума и логики молодежи. В исследовательской литературе подвижные игры в большей степени подверглись научному анализу, а вот, условно говоря, второй группе игр, развивающей интеллект подрастающего поколения, было уделено гораздо меньше внимания. Среди интеллектуальных игр особое место занимает такая народная игра, ставшая традиционной в кочевнической среде, как «восемь примет спинного позвонка» (нурууны ясны найман шинж). Данная интеллектуальная игра получила широкое распространение среди племен империи гуннов. Комплексный анализ указанной игры, проведенный в статье, выявил ее специфические особенности, показал, что это не просто распространенное детское развлечение, а часть культурного наследия тюрко-монгольских народов.

The Kazakhs and Mongolian-speaking nomadic peoples in the past had many unique and diverse types of games. Their national games were mostly associated with the economic activities of nomads, who were mainly engaged in cattle breeding. It is quite natural that the younger generation was well acquainted with the habits and anatomical structure of domestic animals, which, of course, influenced the specifics of children’s gaming entertainment. The aforementioned nomadic peoples had both outdoor games that developed strength and dexterity in children and adolescents, and intellectual games that contributed to the development of the mind and logic of young people. In the research literature, outdoor games have been subjected to scientific analysis to a greater extent, but, relatively speaking, the second group of games that develop the intellect of the younger generation has received much less attention. Among intellectual games, a special place is occupied by such a folk game, which has become traditional in the nomadic environment, as “eight features of the lumbar vertebrae”. This intellectual game was widely spread among the tribes of the Hun Empire. A comprehensive analysis of this game, carried out in the article, revealed its specific features, showed that this is not just a common children’s entertainment, but part of the cultural heritage of the Turkic-Mongolian peoples.

Тюркский фольклормонгольская играмифологияритуалпоясничные позвонкикультурное наследие тюрко-монгольских народовTurkic folkloreMongolian gamemythologyrituallumbar vertebraecultural heritage of the Turkic-Mongolian peoplesReferencesAman naadgaj (2015). Mon-sudar, 211–214.Aman naadgaj (2015). Mon-sudar, 211–214.Basangova, T. G. (2009). The mythology of the genre of “telling by the bone” among the Kalmyks. The peoples of the Caspian region: a dialogue of cultures. Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference. Elista, 158–161 (in Russian).Basangova, T. G. (2009). The mythology of the genre of “telling by the bone” among the Kalmyks. The peoples of the Caspian region: a dialogue of cultures. Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference. Elista, 158–161 (in Russian).Byambaragchaa, G. (2020). About one of the traditional games of the Khalkha Mongols. Mongolica. Vol. 23. No. 1. 5–9. DOI 10.25882/hyr4-5604.Byambaragchaa, G. (2020). About one of the traditional games of the Khalkha Mongols. Mongolica. Vol. 23. No. 1. 5–9. DOI 10.25882/hyr4-5604.Cerensodnom, D. (2000). Mongolyn nuuc tovchoo. Ulaanbaatar, 426–427.Cerensodnom, D. (2000). Mongolyn nuuc tovchoo. Ulaanbaatar, 426–427.Dulam, S. (2018). «Asuuh nuruuny үg» zhүzhig naadmyn aman zohiolyn үүseld holbogdoh n’. Mongol aman zohiol, har’cuulsan aman zohiolyn sudalgaa. Erdem shinzhilgeenij өgүүllijn chuulgan, II bot’, Ulaanbaatar, 380–389. ISBN 978-99978-4-604-4.Dulam, S. (2018). «Asuuh nuruuny үg» zhүzhig naadmyn aman zohiolyn үүseld holbogdoh n’. Mongol aman zohiol, har’cuulsan aman zohiolyn sudalgaa. Erdem shinzhilgeenij өgүүllijn chuulgan, II bot’, Ulaanbaatar, 380–389. ISBN 978-99978-4-604-4.Hoton ardyn aman zohiol (2014). Ulaanbaatar, 426–427.Hoton ardyn aman zohiol (2014). Ulaanbaatar, 426–427.Katuu B. (2011). Oiradyn zarim edlel kheregleliyin tukhay. Ugsaatan sudlal. Bot’ 20. Ulaanbaatar. 286–287.Katuu B. (2011). Oiradyn zarim edlel kheregleliyin tukhay. Ugsaatan sudlal. Bot’ 20. Ulaanbaatar. 286–287.Khaninova, R.M. (2007).The game of alchiki in the historiosophical imagery of Velimir Khlebnikov. Historiosophy in Russian Literature of the XX and XXI centuries: traditions and a New Look: Proceedings of the XI Sheshukov Readings. Moscow, 41–48 (in Russian).Khaninova, R.M. (2007).The game of alchiki in the historiosophical imagery of Velimir Khlebnikov. Historiosophy in Russian Literature of the XX and XXI centuries: traditions and a New Look: Proceedings of the XI Sheshukov Readings. Moscow, 41–48 (in Russian).Medeubekұly, S. (1993). Belomyrtқa. «Ana tіlі» sonin. 01.07. № 326.Medeubekұly, S. (1993). Belomyrtқa. «Ana tіlі» sonin. 01.07. № 326.Mongol ardyn aman zohiolyn deezh bichig (1978). Ulaanbaatar, 87–88.Mongol ardyn aman zohiolyn deezh bichig (1978). Ulaanbaatar, 87–88.Omakaeva E. U. (2003). Kalmyks gaming culture: typology and specifics. Mongol Studies. 2. Elista, 251–264 (in Russian).Omakaeva E. U. (2003). Kalmyks gaming culture: typology and specifics. Mongol Studies. 2. Elista, 251–264 (in Russian).Omakaeva, E. U. (2010). Folk games. Kalmyks. The series “Peoples and Cultures”. Moscow: Nauka, 364–374 (in Russian).Omakaeva, E. U. (2010). Folk games. Kalmyks. The series “Peoples and Cultures”. Moscow: Nauka, 364–374 (in Russian).Orajhanұly, S. Beldemenің segіz syny (Nuruuny yasny najman shinzh). Gar bichmel.Orajhanұly, S. Beldemenің segіz syny (Nuruuny yasny najman shinzh). Gar bichmel.Wangjil, Ba. (1991). Kőke jula: mongγol ulamjilaltu amidural-un toli. Őbűr mongγol-un soyul-un keblel-űn qoriy-a.Wangjil, Ba. (1991). Kőke jula: mongγol ulamjilaltu amidural-un toli. Őbűr mongγol-un soyul-un keblel-űn qoriy-a.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.