Everyday culture of the Nogais in the second half of the 19th–early 20th centuries: comparative analysis
https://doi.org/10.53315/2782-3377-2024-4-2-94-104
Abstract
After the collapse of the Golden Horde, the Nogai Horde as a new Nogai state formation in the south of Russia arose. A small group of the Nogais, settled on the territory of modern Chechnya, created a national minority, but today they occupy a worthy place in the ethnocultural environment of the region. The study of cultural and everyday processes of the peoples living in the Chechen Republic, including the Nogais, is relevant. Simultaneously living in this territory, all national groups are in contact with each other, which leads to the dynamic development of ethnic processes, the interaction of cultural and economic activities, material culture, and ethnocultural relationships in such a densely populated area as the North Caucasus. The relevance of the study lies not only in the scientific and educational aspect, but also in the description of the interethnic, ethnocultural relationships of the peoples of Russia, both in the past and in the present, since these relationships do not lose their significance at the present time. For a more contrasting illumination of the current situation of cultural and everyday processes of the Nogai people in the presented study, the authors will try to provide a historical excursion into the past of this nomadic people living on the territory of the Chechen Republic (subject of the Russian Federation).
Supporting agencies: The work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, Project №22-18-00313 «Transformation of nomadic societies of the South of Russia in the context of natural and factors (XIX — mid XX centuries)», https://rscf.ru/project/22-18-00313/.
About the Authors
D. S. Kidirniyazov
Dagestan Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Daniyal S. Kidirniyazov - Dr. Sc. (History), Professor, Leading Researcher, Institute of History, Archeology and Ethnography of the Dagestan Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
Makhachkala
B. B. Abdulvakhabova
Chechen State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Birlant B. Abdulvakhabova - Candidate of Historical Sciences, Associate Professor, Chechen State University.
Grozny
References
1. Abdulvahabova, B. B.-A. (2016). Chechency i nogajcy: etnokul’turnye vzaimodejstviya (istoriya i sovremennost’). Nogajcy: XXI vek. Istoriya. Yazyk. Kul’tura. Ot istokov — k gryadushchemu. Cherkessk, 160–162 (in Russian).
2. Badmaeva, E. N. (2024). Hlopkovodstvo v Kalmykii i yuzhnyh rajonah Rossii v predvoennye gody. Nomadic Civilization: Historical research. 4. 1. 26–36 (in Russian).
3. Badmaeva, E. N., Erdneeva B. A. (2022). Prirodno-klimaticheskie usloviya territorii i zemledelie v Kalmykii (1917–1925 gg.). Genesis: istoricheskie issledovaniya. 9. 111–122 (in Russian).
4. Badmaeva, E. N., Batyrov, V. V. (2023). Transformaciya zhilishcha kalmykov v usloviyah perekhoda na osedlost’ v imperskij i sovetskij periody. Nauchnyj dialog. 12. 5. 409–426 (in Russian).
5. Batyrov, V. V. (2022). Upadok kalmyckogo verblyudovodstva v kontekste administrativnyh i prirodno-klimaticheskih faktorov v XIX v. Izvestiya Chechenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. A.A. Kadyrova. 4 (28). 109–113 (in Russian).
6. Batyrov, V. V. (2023a). Adaptacionnye strategii kalmykov vo vtoroj polovine processy perekhoda k poluosedlomu hozyajstvu. Nomadic Civilization: Historical research. 3. 4. 57–70 (in Russian).
7. Batyrov, V. V. (2023 b). Krizis sistemy sezonnyh perekochyovok v XIX v. kak osnovnoj faktor perekhoda k poluosedlomu i osedlomu hozyajstvu. Kaspijskij region: politika, ekonomika, kul’tura. 2 (75). 32–40 (in Russian).
8. Dzhumagulova, A.T. (2022). Osobennosti sostoyaniya ekonomiki nogajskih obshchestv Severnogo Kavkaza v XIX–nachale XX vekov. Nauchnyj dialog. 11. 7. 377–397 (in Russian).
9. Dzhumagulova,A.T. (2023a). Sovetskij proekt v nogajskoj stepi v 1930–1940-e gg.: ot kollektivizacii k melioracii. Elektronnyj zhurnal «Kavkazologiya». 3. 133–152 (in Russian).
10. Dzhumagulova, A.T. (2023b). Recepciya sovetskogo proekta v nogajskih stepyah Severnogo Kavkaza v 1920–1930-e gg. Kaspijskij region: politika, ekonomika, kul’tura. 2 (75). 91–101 (in Russian).
11. Gimbatova, M. B. (2010). Obychaj vzaimopomoshchi i obshchestvennoj zhizni nogajcev (XIX–XX veka). Aktual’nye problemy istorii Kavkaza. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoj konferencii, posvyashchennoj 100-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya professora R. M. Magomedova. Mahachkala: Dagestanskij gosudarstvennyj universitet. 260–262 (in Russian).
12. Kerejtov, R. H. (2009). Nogajcy. Osobennosti etnicheskoj istorii i bytovoj kul’tury / nauchn. red. Yu. Yu. Klychnikov. Stavropol’: Servisshkola (in Russian).
13. Kidirniyazov, D. S. (2022). Zemel’no-pravovye otnosheniya i sedentarizaciya nogajcev vo vtoroj polovine XIX– nachale XX vv. Nauchnyj dialog. 11. 7. 398–416.
14. Kidirniyazov, D. S. (2023a). Sochinenie I.T. Mutenina kak istochnik po ekonomicheskomu razvitiyu nogajcev Severo-Vostochnogo Kavkaza v XIX– nachale XX vv. Vestnik Akademii nauk Chechenskoj Respubliki. 2 (61). 30–38 (in Russian).
15. Kidirniyazov, D. S. (2023b). Gorod v sisteme hozyajstvennyh interesov kochevyh soobshchestv stepnoj polosy Evrazii v XVI–XIX vv. Kaspijskij region: politika, ekonomika, kul’tura. 2 (75). 21–25 (in Russian).
16. Lidzhieva, I. V. (2016). Problema vodosnabzheniya v kalmyckoj stepi v nachale XX v. (po materialam ajmachnyh i hotonnyh prigovorov). Magna adsurgit: Historia Studiorum. 1. 61–70.
17. Lidzhieva, I. V. (2022). Puti hozyajstvennogo razvitiya Kalmyckoj stepi v ocenkah stolichnyh chinovnikov (poslednyaya tret’ XIX– nachale XX vv.). Novyj istoricheskij vestnik. 4 (74). 48–62 (in Russian).
18. Lidzhieva, I. V. (2023). Sistema prirodopol’zovaniya v resheniyah obshchestvennyh skhodov kochevyh inorodcev. Istoriya gosudarstva i prava. 8. 68–74 (in Russian).
19. Magomaev, V. H., Kidirniyazov, D. S. (2017). Nogajcy v severokavkazskom istoricheskom processe v XVI–nachale XX v. Groznyj: Izdatel’stvo Akademii nauk Chechenskoj respubliki (in Russian).
20. Narody Dagestana (2002). Seriya «Narody i kul’tury». Otv. red. S. A. Arutyunov i dr. Moskva: Nauka (in Russian).
21. Nataev, S. A. (2013). Chechenskie tajpy: Problemy izucheniya prirody, strutkury i istoricheskoj dinamiki social’nyh institutov chechencev. Mahachkala: ALEF (in Russian).
22. Omakaeva, E. U. (2005). Folk knowledge in the life-support system of the Kalmyk ethnos. Combating Desertification: Traditional Knowledge and Modern Technology for the Sustainable Management of Dryland Ecosystems. Proceedings of the International Workshop (Elista, Republic of Kalmykia, Russian Federation, 23–27 June 2004). Paris: UNESCO, Division of Ecological and Earth Sciences. 117–123 (in English).
23. Omakaeva, E. U. (2008). The calendar knowledge of nomadic peoples as it reflects in the Kalmyk lexicon and worldview. Nomadic society and cross-cultural dialogue (Ulan-Bator, 12–14 sentyabrya 2008 goda). Ulan-Bator: “Sansuday” Design&Printing Co., Ltd. 40 (in English).
24. Omakaeva, E. U. (2023). Yurt as a value of Kalmyk linguistic culture / T. S. Esenova, G. B. Esenova, E. U. Omakaeva. SHS Web of Conferences. 164. 00057 (in English).
25. Omakaeva, E. U., Badmaeva E. N. (2024). The Role of Weather and the Natural-Climate Factor in the Daily Nomadic Life of the Kalmyks in the Context of Traditional Nature Utilization: Effective Frontier Practices. Journal of Frontier Studies. 9. 1(33). 82–100 (in English).
Review
For citations:
Kidirniyazov D.S., Abdulvakhabova B.B. Everyday culture of the Nogais in the second half of the 19th–early 20th centuries: comparative analysis. Nomadic civilization: historical research. 2024;4(2):94-104. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.53315/2782-3377-2024-4-2-94-104
Views:
171
Email this article 