The future of religion in post-secular society: vectors and models of transformation
https://doi.org/10.53315/2782-3377-2025-5-4-83-95
Abstract
This article analyzes the transformations of religion in a post-secular society — a new cultural and social reality that emerged after the obvious crisis of the classical theory of secularization, which predicted the inevitable disappearance of religion during modernization. Drawing on the works of P. Berger, J. Habermas, B. Turner, M. Epstein, and other authors, this article demonstrates that religion is not being marginalized, but rather reimagined: it is neither returning to its pre-modern sacred integrity nor dissolving into secular culture. Instead, new, more flexible forms of religiosity are emerging. The article highlights the key vectors of these changes: desecularization as the return of religion to the public sphere; individualization and pluralization of faith; the digitalization of religious practice; and the emergence of “low-intensity religion” and “poor faith”— religiosity without strict dogma, institutional affiliation, or ritual obligation. Particular attention is given to Buddhism as a religious tradition highly adaptable to postsecular conditions: its non-theistic anthropology, focus on personal experience, ethics of nonviolence and compassion, and openness to dialogue with science make it particularly relevant in the contemporary world. The Russian context is also examined, where Buddhism, as a traditional religion, actively participates in interreligious dialogue and social initiatives. The article’s conclusions indicate that the future of religion lies neither in the restoration of its old institutional forms nor in their complete loss, but in the search for an authentic spirituality capable of preserving the depth of meaning in the context of freedom, pluralism, and digital everyday life.
About the Author
M. S. UlanovРоссия
Mergen S. Ulanov, Doctor of Philosophy, Associate Professor
Elista
References
1. Bagayeva, K. A. (2019). Desekuliarizatsiya i trend postsekulyarnogo [Desecularization and the Postsecular Trend]. Vestnik Buryatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya, 2, 43–48.
2. Berger, P. (1999). The Desecularization of the World: A Global Overview. Washington, D.C.: Ethics and Public Policy Center.
3. Berger, P. (2012). Falsifitsirovannaya sekulyarizatsiya [Falsified Secularization]. Gosudarstvo, religiya, tserkov’ v Rossii i za rubezhom, 2, 8–20.
4. Caputo, J. (2011). Kak sekulyarnyy mir stal postsekulyarnym [How the Secular World Became Postsecular]. Logos, 3(82), 186–205.
5. Caputo, J. (2014). Religiya “Zvyozdnykh voyn” [The Religion of “Star Wars”]. Logos, 5(101), 131–140.
6. Davlatova, S. T. (2025). Buddizm i mezhkonfessional’nyy dialog: put’ k garmonii i vzaimoponimaniyu v mnogrannom mire [Buddhism and Interfaith Dialogue: A Path to Harmony and Mutual Understanding in a Multifaceted World]. Nomadic Civilization: Historical Research, 5(3), 93–102.
7. Dobbelaere, K. (1981). Secularization: A Multi-dimensional Concept. Current Sociology, 29(2), 1–213.
8. Durkheim, É. (2018). Elementarnyye formy religioznoy zhizni. Totemicheskaya sistema v Avstralii [The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. The Totemic System in Australia]. Moskva: Izdatel’skiy dom “Delo” RANKhiGS.
9. Epstein, M. N. (2013). Religiya posle ateizma. Novyye vozmozhnosti teologii [Religion After Atheism: New Possibilities for Theology]. Moskva: Izdatel’skiy dom AST-PRESS.
10. Finke, R., & Stark, R. (2005). The Churching of America, 1776–2005: Winners and Losers in Our Religious Economy. New Brunswick & New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.
11. Freud, S. (2009). Budushcheye odnoy illyuzii [The Future of an Illusion]. Moskva: AST.
12. Habermas, J. (2006). Religion in the Public Sphere. European Journal of Philosophy, 14(1), 1–25.
13. Habermas, J. (2008). Postsekulyarnoye obshchestvo — chto eto? Chast’ pervaya [What Is a Postsecular Society? Part One]. Rossiyskaya filosofskaya gazeta, 4, 1–2.
14. Huntington, S. (1994). Stolknoveniye tsivilizatsiy? [The Clash of Civilizations?]. Polis, 1, 33–48.
15. Kepel, G. (1994). The Revenge of God: The Resurgence of Islam, Christianity and Judaism in the Modern World. Cambridge: Polity Press.
16. King, M. (2005). Art and the Postsecular. Journal of Visual Art Practice, 4(1), 3–17.
17. Kuz’mina, E. V., & Fazleeva, R. R. (2017). Postsekulyarnost’: tendentsii analiza fenomena v sovremennykh religiovedcheskikh issledovaniyakh [Postsecularity: Trends in the Analysis of the Phenomenon in Contemporary Religious Studies]. Manuskript, 8(82), 106–112.
18. Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1955). Sochineniya [Collected Works] (Vol. 1). Moskva: Politizdat.
19. Nietzsche, F. (2011). Vesyolaya nauka [The Gay Science]. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo “Azbuka-klassika”.
20. Stekel, C. (2012). K opredeleniyu “postsekulyarnogo” [Toward a Definition of the “Postsecular”]. Chelovek.RU, 8, 51–67.
21. Taylor, Ch. (2020). Novyy dukhovnyy landshaft. Religioznoye soznaniye v postsekulyarnom obshchestve [The New Spiritual Landscape: Religious Consciousness in a Postsecular Society]. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo BBI, 6–41.
22. Turner, B. (2012). Religiya v postsekulyarnom obshchestve [Religion in a Postsecular Society]. Gosudarstvo, religiya, Tserkov’ v Rossii i za rubezhom, 30(2), 21–510.
23. Ulanov, M. S., & Badmaev, V. N. (2023). Fenomen sotsial’no vovlechennogo buddizma v sovremennom mire [The Phenomenon of Socially Engaged Buddhism in the Modern World]. Novyye issledovaniya Tuvy, 3, 138–150.
24. Wernick, A. (2010). The Future of Religion. B.S. Turner (Ed.), Sociology of Religion Chichester: WileyBlackwell. 630–648.
Review
For citations:
Ulanov M.S. The future of religion in post-secular society: vectors and models of transformation. Nomadic civilization: historical research. 2025;5(4):83-95. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.53315/2782-3377-2025-5-4-83-95
JATS XML
















