Preview

Nomadic civilization: historical research

Advanced search

The Buddhist concept of time in the culture of the Mongolian ethnic groups

https://doi.org/10.53315/2782-3377-2025-5-4-96-108

Abstract

In the context of the crisis of linear models of progress and growing global uncertainty, alternative ontologies of time developed within non-Western cultural traditions gain particular relevance. This article examines the Buddhist understanding of time within the cultural framework of Mongolian ethnic groups. Unlike sedentary civilizations, which emphasize long-term planning and institutional stability, nomadic societies cultivated a perception of time as an open, fluid field where the future is not predetermined but continuously shaped in the present through ethical intentions and actions. Buddhism, once integrated into nomadic culture, did not displace indigenous beliefs but merged with them syncretically, offering resilience through inner morality rather than external structures. Karma was not viewed as fatalistic destiny but as a transformable system dependent on mindfulness and personal responsibility. Such an understanding of time emphasizes not so much the chronological sequence of events as the qualitative depth of the present moment and the ethical orientation of one’s deeds. For nomadic societies whose lives are intimately tied to natural rhythms and the constant need for adaptation the future could never be fixed; it remained open and dynamic. Buddhist ethics reinforced this worldview by introducing an element of spiritual accountability. This model, grounded in presence, a deep connection with nature, and the ethical co-creation of the future, acquires renewed significance in an era of global crises. As traditional paradigms for managing uncertainty reach their limits, flexibility, mindfulness, and ecological ethics become essential resources for survival and development. The Mongolian tradition thus offers not merely an alternative conception of time, but a practical philosophy of resilience one in which humans do not dominate nature but act as its responsible stewards.

About the Author

V. Kh. Khomutnikov
Kalmyk State University named after B.B. Gorodovikov
Россия

Vasily Kh. Khomutnikov, Candidate of Philosophical Sciences

Elista



References

1. Abaev, N.V. (2010). Buddhism in Central Asia and Trans-Sayania. The New Research of Tuva. Available at: www.tuva.asia. Special edition (in English).

2. Abaeva, L.L. (2013). Traditsionnoe mirovozzrenie mongol’skikh narodov v lokuse prostranstva i vremeni (Traditional worldview of Mongolian peoples in the locus of space and time). Evraziistvo i mir, No. 1, 56–64 (in Russian).

3. Androsov, V.P. (2006). Uchenie Nagarjunny o Sredinnosti: issledovanie i perevod s sanskrita “Korennikh strof o Sredinnosti” (“Mula-madhyamaka-karika”); perevod s tib. “Tolkovaniya Korennikh strof o Sredinnosti, (nazyvaemogo) Besstrashnym (oproverzheniem dogmaticheskikh vozzrenii)” (“Mulamadhyamaka-vritti Akutobhaya”) (Nagarjuna’s Doctrine of the Middle Way: Research and Translation from Sanskrit of the “Fundamental Verses on the Middle Way” (“Mūlamadhyamakakārikā”); Translation from Tibetan of the Commentary “Fearless Refutation of Dogmatic Views” (“Mūlamadhyamakavṛtti Akutobhaya”)). Moscow: Vostochnaya literatura (in Russian).

4. Badmaev, V.N. (2016). Kalmytskii etnos v transkul’turnom prostranstve Yuga Rossii (The Kalmyk ethnos in the transcultural space of Southern Russia). Gumanitarii Yuga Rossii, No. 1, 120–129 (in Russian).

5. Buddizm v istorii i kul’ture buryat (Buddhism in the History and Culture of the Buryats) (2014). Collective monograph; ed. by I.R. Garri. Ulan-Ude: Buryaad-Mongol Nom (in Russian).

6. Douson, K.G. (2000). Religiya i kul’tura (Religion and Culture). Trans. from Engl., introd., comm.: Kozhurin K.Ya. St. Petersburg: Aletheia (in Russian).

7. Esenova, T.S. (2012). Ocherki po lingvokul’ture kalmykov (Essays on the Linguoculture of the Kalmyks). Elista: Kalmyk State University Press (in Russian).

8. Omakaeva, E.U. (2000). Yazyk i religiya v zerkale traditsionnoi kul’tury kalmykov: proshloe i sovremennost’ (Language and religion in the mirror of traditional Kalmyk culture: past and present). In: Buddiiskaya kul’tura i mirovaya tsivilizatsiya na poroge tret’ego tysyacheletiya (Buddhist Culture and World Civilization on the Threshold of the Third Millennium). St. Petersburg–Elista, 131–136 (in Russian).

9. Omakaeva, E.U. (2005). Vremya i prostranstvo v buddiiskoi kartinе mira (Time and space in the Buddhist worldview). In: Aziya v Evrope: vzaimodeistvie tsivilizatsii. “Yazyk, kul’tura, etnos v globalizirovannom mire: na styke tsivilizatsii i vremen” (Asia in Europe: Interaction of Civilizations. “Language, Culture, Ethnos in a Globalized World: At the Crossroads of Civilizations and Times”). Conference proceedings, Part 2. Elista, 116–118 (in Russian).

10. Ulanov, M.S., Tyumidova, M.E., Doronin, Yu.P. (2020). Rol’ prirodno-khozyaistvennykh faktorov v formirovanii mentaliteta kalmykov (The role of natural and economic factors in shaping the Kalmyk mentality). Vestnik Kalmytskogo universiteta, No. 4 (48), 144–151 (in Russian).

11. Zhukovskaya, N.L. (1988). Kategorii i simvolika traditsionnoi kul’tury mongolov (Categories and Symbolism of Traditional Mongolian Culture). Moscow: Nauka, GRVL (in Russian).


Review

For citations:


Khomutnikov V.Kh. The Buddhist concept of time in the culture of the Mongolian ethnic groups. Nomadic civilization: historical research. 2025;5(4):96-108. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.53315/2782-3377-2025-5-4-96-108

Views: 19

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2782-3377 (Online)